Talk:The Wing (workspace)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (your reason here) --Nyugirl2699 (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not finished yet, I am in the process of linking the information within the text to other external links and other articles. All the information and content on this page is correct and our citations are in the references. They will be linked soon and more will be put onto the page soon.

@Nyugirl2699: The key problem is the article was a copyright violation of other websites. I've restarted the article with a basic description, citied to coverage of Bloomberg which covers the co-workspace in some depth. In the meantime, take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, which is designed to improve coverage of women's topics on Wikipedia. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add the fact that The Wing was finally required to follow discrimination laws[edit]

source: https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/08/womens-co-working-space-the-wing-adjusts-membership-policy-to-allow-all-genders/

108.39.199.14 (talk) 17:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User MorrisJumel[edit]

MorrisJumel (talk) has been constantly undoing updates without providing constructive criticism of what she would find to be acceptable in terms of adding the fact that The Wing is finally accepting men as well as women. As of right now, the most recent update simply says "The Wing is no longer discriminatory in membership" -- this is a fact backed up by a reputable source, which has been cited. If MorrisJumel (talk) undoes this edit instead of re-writing to whatever standards she has in mind, I think it is clear that she is doing it in bad faith, does not want this information posted here, and is not interested in accuracy for this article. 108.39.199.14 (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting information without reliable sources to verify it. You continue to push the POV that this organization is illegal without proof. Has the New York commissioner investigation concluded? Do you know something I don't? Please stop your focus on inserting your POV into this page. Stop accusing me of acting in bad faith and casting aspersions without any proof. Please discuss your edits here and reach a consensus before inserting them. You can also use the tools described at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. MorrisJumel (talk) 04:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]