Talk:The Worship Project

The Worship Project has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 8, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Christian music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from The Worship Project appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 November 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that MercyMe's independent album The Worship Project sold over 60,000 copies and helped them gain a contract with INO Records?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Worship Project.

Wikipedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Worship Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wisdomworks.org/ResourceStore/mercymestore.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Worship Project/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mymis (talk · contribs) 18:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Mymis

Hello, I do wish to review your article. Please note that this is my first time reviewing an article, you are welcome to disagree with my comments. Mymis (talk) 18:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

General

All the figure dashes (-) must be replaced with en dashes (–), per MOS:DASH.
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

"organs and violins" → I would suggest linking the instruments.
- Done. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"selling over 60,000 copies" → In the US or worldwide? The Release section says they sold it within a year, I think it should be included in the intro as well.
- The sources do not say; done.Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"In writing songs for the album, MercyMe used a basic" → A bit odd sentence structure, maybe just "MercyMe wrote songs for the album using a basic.."
- Done. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that these three long sentences about what kind of albums the band released afterwards are a bit off-topic and not very important mentioning, especially in the introduction, in my opinion. Maybe just merge it in one short sentence, like: "The band further released one independant album before making a decision to sign with a major record label."
- Done. How does it look now? Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's important to mention the success of "I Can Only Imagine", especially that it was certified double platinum.
- Done. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Background and composition

"..released four independent records, Christian alternative rock albums that drew.." → doesn't sound like a grammaticaly correct sentece, maybe ".. records that were all Christian alternative rock albums influenced by grunge music"
- Changed to "Prior to the release of The Worship Project, MercyMe had independently released four Christian alternative rock albums, drawing influence from the grunge style popular at the time." Is that good? Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"While playing live, however, the ba.." → I think you missed a word in this sentence, doesn't sound right. I'd suggest starting a new sentence after a word "audiences". Like, "In contrast, their covers of popular worship songs received a greater reception during their live performances, which lead the band to write and produce..."
- Done. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"written by Millard and composed by" → mmm, not very clear what is "written" and "composed"? you meant "write lyrics" and compose music"?
- Changed to "With the exception of "Beautiful", a song Cochran wrote the lyrics and music to, the lyrics on the album were written by Millard, while the music was composed by the entire band". Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"because it meant so much to Millard" → sounds informal
- Changed to 'was important to Millard'. Is that good? Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"The Pig Sty" → is it a recording studio?
- I assume - the liner notes say that is where it was recorded and give the location, but I couldn't find anything about it other than that, so I can't say for sure. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"worship" → is already linked once in the section
- Delinked. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Hammond-style organs" → link "organs"
- Done. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Release, reception, and impact

You used "released" twice in the first two sentences, maybe replace the second one with "issued"
- Great idea! Done. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"the internet" → the Internet is always capitalized
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"did appear on any" → you missed a word "not"
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
About the sales, again, you should mention where it was sold. Also, the source for the estimated toal sales is from ten years ago, you should then add "as of 2006".
- Same answer as above - sources don't say. The other is Fixed.
"topping the Christian radio charts" → in the USA or worldwide?
- US; fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"certified 2× platinum" → "double-platinum"
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"over 2 digital copies" → only 2 copies? :)
- Lol, fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel

is "lifted" a right word? maybe just omit it
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
no need linking "MercyMe"
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

"Credits" → "Credits and tracklist from.."
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Chicago Sun-Times → Chicago Sun-Times
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The sources look very good, just don't forget fixing the dashes.
- Those should be fixed now. Toa Nidhiki05 00:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further fixes

"which Cochran wrote the lyrics and music to" → the preposition at the end does not sound very nice, maybe, "which was solely written by Cochran"?
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 16:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraph starting with "The Worship Project has been described as being a" → you use word "described" four times, sounds a bit repetitive. maybe replace the third one with "consider": "Mark Allan Powell considered "Happy Little Love Song" being a" or something like that.
- Good idea; fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 16:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"The stress of selling the album directly" → maybe "the difficulty"?
- Done. Toa Nidhiki05 16:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
About.com → About.com
- Fixed. Just noticed that citation was duplicated so removed the duplicate. Toa Nidhiki05 16:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The New York Times Company does not own About.com, no need mentioning it
- Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 16:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks way better now, would be more than happy to promote it once you adress these remaining minor issues. Mymis (talk) 15:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you fixed all the listed problems. It is a well-written article with no original research or any copyvio detected. The sources are all reliable well formatted. I am happy to promote it. Good job! Mymis (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]