Jump to content

Talk:Theo Vennemann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No secondary sources

[edit]

WP requires secondary sources in order for the text to be reliable. Some secondary comments about these very bold theories would be profitable for all. I'll mark the article accordingly. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 10:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Punic is not correct

[edit]

V. does not say, that Punians and Carthagians settled northern Europe. This settlement, leading to the megalithic culture, took place 4000 BC, Punians were at most reported 1000 BC, if not 400 BC. Read Baldi & Page, they give a correct short version of V. theories, although being critical.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Theo Vennemann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult to understand !

[edit]

So his theories include a criticism? Written by some Baldi and Page ? Or by him ? Or are his theories not by him, but by Baldi and Page ? That is difficult to understand. It's the first theory I have heard of which starts with a criticism of itself. 159.192.238.75 (talk) 14:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]