Talk:There Is a Hell Believe Me I've Seen It. There Is a Heaven Let's Keep It a Secret./GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Retrohead (talk · contribs) 10:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Media

Both images are under free use. The album artwork, although authorized, has the proper license.
Audio samples are with appropriate sound quality and under 30 seconds, so nothing to correct here. They also have a use rationale, which is always needed.

References

The titles of the Blabbermouth citations shouldn't be capitalized.
The link to Ryanrockshow.com is dead, and I doubt that counts as a reliable source.
The Jakob Printzlau reference is self-published and broken, so it needs to be replaced.
Midnight Mixtape is also dead link. Not sure it is reliable either.
The Kerrang! magazine (cite 48) doesn't specify which page or article is used.
Since the bibliography features aren't books, why don't you incorporate them as part of the citations? A couple of pages from a music magazine couldn't be regarded as bibliography.
Please check the external links in the GA toolbox (upper right corner of this page) to see what specific links need to be updated.

Prose

Avoid constructions like "this album". Since the article is about this recording, you can use "the album" instead.
Is there a need to link Henrick Udd?
What caught my eye on the first glimpse was the lack of prose in the 'Critical reception'. You haven't discussed the majority of the reviews listed in the box, and non-grade reviews shouldn't be placed in the table (BBC Music). Furthermore, if the grade is written in the table, it's not needed to repeat it again in the text (Rock Sound and Metal Hammer).
The 'Commercial performance' would benefit from further research. Information such as first week sales in UK isn't here, and it would be nice to know how much did it sell in the second week or after a month.
Since we're having a 'Release and promotion', I think it can be expanded with all of the music videos the singles received, and their chart success. I noted that this section is partially developed–only a few singles were explained, and some not.
Performances is written with small "p" in the next section's title.
Try to lessen the date/month/year format here. Not that is "wrong", but it certainly drags away the readers attention. That would also make the prose read more fluently.
The non-prose sections are properly formatted and sourced, nothing to correct here.

I'll put the article on hold. There is some research and improvement it needs to be done, so you've got a full week ahead of you. Good luck.--Retrohead (talk) 06:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the nominator has been sporadically active the last month, so there's no need for the article to still be on hold. Closing the review as unsuccessful.--Retrohead (talk) 08:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]