Talk:Thermodynamic modelling
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suggestions
[edit]@Nimarazmjoo Than you for your contributions. Footnotes should be inserted along the text (at the end of any sentence or at least of any paragraph). In the "References" section you have to put only the "reference list" tag you'll find in "edit", menu "insert" at the bottom. You need also to put in bold style the subject of the article in the lead section in the first phrase. Good work. Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 13:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Pure component modelling
[edit]@Nimarazmjoo I think that this section can be maybe better explained in order to be more clear for the readers who are not very familiar with the topic Shoba98 (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Shoba98 Hi there! Thanks for the feedback! I tried to clarify it more without going further in details. Nimarazmjoo (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Nimarazmjoo Great, besides that article is very good. Compliments for the good work! Shoba98 (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
General comment
[edit]Hi,
The article is generally well-written. Sometimes, I found some difficulties in reading because some sentences are quite long and articulated.
I agree with @Shoba98 about the section on pure component modelling
Good job anyway! Paolo Gajoni (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Well-researched, clear and easy to read lead section. Thank you for the contribution!