Talk:This Girl (Cookin' on 3 Burners song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 27 July 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Consensus is that while this song receives more page views, it is too recent to tell if this is a long-standing pattern. The question will be worth revisiting at a later time as page views even out. Cúchullain t/c 14:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



– Following Talk:This Girl (Stafford Brothers and Eva Simons song)#Requested move 3 July 2016, which was closed two weeks ago with a consensus to move, this article has received the vast majority of page views of all topics named "This Girl". Page view statistics show that the disambiguation page is inconveniencing a significant number of readers who are most likely looking for this article. The Cookin' on 3 Burners song is also the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "This Girl" with regards to long-term significance, because it has charted at single digit positions in many national charts, including #1 in a few charts, compared to the Stafford Brothers and Eva Simons song, which has only charted at a double-digit position in a single chart. SSTflyer 12:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Too soon? Two weeks worth of page view stats for a single that was released just six months ago, that's not the most convincing primary topic argument. I don't think you can reasonably claim any "long term significance". PC78 (talk) 15:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak opposeWP:RECENTISM (although perhaps borderline, as the chart performance does show a likely persistence). —BarrelProof (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – No need for a move to "This Girl". Billboard Man (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why is this being treated as a "Kungs vs Cookin' on 3 Burners" song?[edit]

Why does it mention that it is "performed by Kungs" and is a "remix" of the "original"? Shouldn't this refer to the original 2009 release? This makes as much sense as putting "Waves is a song performed by Robin Schultz, and is a remix of Mr Probz' original" on the article of that song in question. --82.3.247.25 (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on This Girl (Cookin' on 3 Burners song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]