Talk:Thomas Holloway
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled[edit]
Thomas's mother was not in fact widowed in Penzance; his father died in London in 1836. [Author, biography of Thomas Holloway, publ. by RHC.]
Royal Holloway College is indeed inspired by Chateau Chambord, but the Sanatorium building in Virginia Water is a Dutch Gothic building loosely based on the Cloth Hall at Ypres.
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thomas Holloway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107130753/http://www.stamp.demon.co.uk/Philately/ProtectiveOverprintsAndUnderprints/UserPages/Holloway244/Holloway244.htm to http://www.stamp.demon.co.uk/Philately/ProtectiveOverprintsAndUnderprints/UserPages/Holloway244/Holloway244.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
scientific evaluation of them after his death showed that few of them contained any ingredients which would be considered to be of significant medicinal value[edit]
I am proposing to remove this statement on the following 2 grounds (a) the citation does not appear to justify the statement (b) lack of efficacy was actually the norm in the 19th century any objections? Brownturkey (talk) 08:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)