Talk:Thomas Young (scientist)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Color Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Quakers Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (assessed as Mid-importance).

Physics: Biographies / History Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 10, 2017.

German wiki[edit]

The German wikipedia mentions a Young's formula, which supposedly governs wetting to some extent. Yet I can find no mention of it here. Could someone please check to see if Thomas Young did in fact formulate this formula:

\cos \Theta ={\frac {\sigma _{S}-\sigma _{LS}}{\sigma _{L}}}

-- Ec5618 10:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article on Surface Energy credits Thomas Young and links to the article on Contact Angle which appears to be angle Theta in your formula. I think it is an accomplishment worth adding to the Thomas Young article. Also there should be mention of the Young temperament and possibly Young's Rule for determining child medicine doses.

Harold14370 16:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Last Person to Know Everything"?[edit]

How can he be considered "the last person to know everything" when two of the others claiming the same "title" (Coolerige, Goethe) died after Young? 208.201.250.2 04:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not meaning any disrespect to the two persons mentioned, but I don't think they really qualify. Coleridge was pretty much just a poet. I don't even know why he was mentioned. Goethe made an impact as poet, dramatist, and novelist which are closely related. As a scientist, he really made no impact. His theory of light was a crock. As a painter, he just dabbled. A great man surely, but not really a polymath on the same order as Young. Harold14370 03:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs work[edit]

Please compare this article to the Answers.com entries and improve this article. For instance, Young was the first to use the term energy in its modern, physical sense.--76.220.203.60 06:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F = kx (formula attributed to Newton)[edit]

In the section titled "Young's modulus", the formula F = kx is attributed to Newton, but I always thought that was (Robert) Hooke's law of elasticity. Does anyone know for certain who devised this "law"? Did Newton also devise this relationship/law? TimProof 19:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the books I've consulted say Hooke. The only Newton connection is that Newton prevented Hooke's ideas from being given any play while Newton was alive. Dicklyon 23:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Zachary Young[edit]

I'm sure that J. Z. Young was a stalwart fellow, but surely the place to mention that he's a direct line descendant of Thomas Young is on his own (large and lengthy already) wikipedia article, and not on Thomas Young's. arkuat (talk) 06:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not mention it in both? Dicklyon (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because then we'd be expected to do the research to make sure that all of Thomas Young's other descendants who were at least as notable as JZ were also mentioned in Thomas Young's article. arkuat (talk) 21:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lame excuse; there is no requirement to be complete or balanced in wikipedia. Dicklyon (talk) 21:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think in this case an excuse is required for leaving this irrelevancy in Thomas Young's article, and no excuse is required for removing it. arkuat (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor of Physics?[edit]

German wikipedia says that he obtained a decree as doctor of medicine. Considering physics' reputation back then, this seems to be more credible. Possibly change the article in this regard? Christoph Hahn (talk) 11:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check and cite a source or two in the process. Apparently the Göttingen degree and later degrees at Cambridge were in "physic", which is what physician studies, i.e. what we now call medicine. See this book and this book. Dicklyon (talk) 16:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D'accord. I was confused by a today's statement of my professor. Christoph Hahn (talk) 17:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pendulum[edit]

The text says: "In 1816 he was secretary of a commission charged with ascertaining the length of the second's pendulum" There have been amendments concerning the apostrophe - but what does a "second's pendulum" mean? Myrvin (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It had been editted without comment to "second pendulum", which is clearly not what was intended. You can find hudreds of books that talk about a "second's pendulum" or a "seconds pendulum" on google book search. Dicklyon (talk) 02:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You make it seem that what it is is obvious - it isn't. There is an article in Wiki on the "seconds pendulum", so there should be a link. Also perhaps a short explanation. Myrvin (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did it myself Myrvin (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

. doi:10.1364/AO.2.00063. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
http://www.bmj.com/content/4/5937/150.full.pdf. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
Crichton-Browne, Sir James (1914). "The Thomas Young Oration". Transactions of the Optical Society. 15: 1. doi:10.1088/1475-4878/15/S/301.
. doi:10.1001/jama.1890.02410370004001a. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
http://archopht.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/73/4/587.pdf. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
"THOMAS YOUNG‟S CONTRIBUTIONS TO PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS" (PDF).
"Thomas Young: Physician Polymath".
"Thomas Young's research on fluid transients: 200 years on" (PDF).
Atchison, D. A.; Charman, W. N. (2010). "Thomas Young's contribution to visual optics: the Bakerian lecture "On the mechanism of the eye"". Journal of Vision. 10: 16. doi:10.1167/10.12.16.
Davidson, Michael W. (2010). "Pioneers in Optics: Richard Adolph Zsigmondy and Thomas Young". Microscopy Today. 18: 50. doi:10.1017/S1551929510000969.
Atchison, D. A.; Charman, W. N. (2010). "Thomas Young's contribution to visual optics: the Bakerian lecture "On the mechanism of the eye"". Journal of Vision. 10: 16. doi:10.1167/10.12.16. PMID 21047748.

--Stone (talk) 08:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latest edits[edit]

There have been some strange edits by Cajun80.I have reverted them. Myrvin (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last person to read everything?[edit]

Does anyone know if it's true that he was the last person to read all books (in English, presumably) that were published up to and including his lifetime? (I'm sure that can't be strictly true since I'm sure some books were published just before his death, but it could be true up until a certain point in his life.) If true, should it be mentioned? M-1 (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Young on animals?[edit]

I found this work called "An Essay on Humanity to Animals" (1798) at Googlebooks, and I wonder whether this is the Thomas Young of this article or another. Hope somebody may help.--Goose friend (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read this [1]; and this [2]. Myrvin (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boxhorn and IE[edit]

Boxhorn's name for the group was Scythian because he did not know about Sanskrit. The information about Boxhorn here is irrelevant (Pamour (talk) 15:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Logical semantics[edit]

The fourth paragraph in 'biography' reads, ". . . in 1818, after his death, he became secretary . . ." He didn't die until 1829 and I am finding it so difficult to contribute to this page on my smart phone (not being able to copy from the page in question and paste to here) I shan't bother in future. Kevin M Skinner (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC) Kevin M Skinner Kevin M Skinner (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That vandalism edit was reverted, and then the revert was self-reverted. So I reverted that. Now it's fixed, I think. Dicklyon (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Thomas Young[edit]

This page should not be Thomas Young (scientist), it should be main the “Thomas Young” page. Duh, to ∞.