Jump to content

Talk:Thored

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThored has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 21, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 4, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Thored, ealdorman of southern Northumbria, disappears from the historical records after being charged with leading a fleet against marauding Vikings?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Thored/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting GA review Jezhotwells (talk) 18:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

Pass quickfail criteria Jezhotwells (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS):
    • OK
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    • OK
    c (OR):
    • No evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    • Broad in scope
    b (focused):
    • Focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    • NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I've given this article a copy-edit. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]