Talk:Three certainties/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bencherlite ^Talk 12:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Reading this is bringing back painful memories of university days...

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'm sure you're planning to write about Express trusts in English law, but at the moment it's an annoying redlink right at the start of the lead – can you link for the time being to express trust? Apart from that, and the minor tweaks I've made, I think this is ready for the badge. Bencherlite ^Talk 12:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be happy to have painful memories of oxbridge :P. I've got to write a few other things first, but yes, express trusts in English law is certainly a target. Still waiting on those Stack articles, btw :P. Ironholds (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]