Talk:Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is well done. The only thing that I would change would be to add the references more densely (not leaving more than one unreffed sentence between refs). This makes it easier for maintenance and if further content is added down the road. Reviewer: Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I seem to recall that we had a similar discussion on Talk:Pneumothorax. As far as I know, it is not necessary to link every sentence if all sentences together concern themselves with the same point. Is there a policy on this? JFW | T@lk 10:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

No policy on this that I am aware of. Just that the page will get less harassment and will be easier to keep uptodate if more refs. Will leave it up to you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:19, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Will have a look and see which sentences seem to be hanging in the air without sourcing. JFW | T@lk 10:31, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Passed

On the above note:

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass: - Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)