Talk:Tila Tequila/GA1

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I feel that Tila Tequila no longer meets the good article criteria. The lead does not adequately summarize then article; it's more of a summary of the magazines she's been in; fairly low mentioned of her reality shows (both seasons) and nothing on music information. There are two {{fact}} tags as well in the body of the article, while other things are just clearly not cited. There hasn't even been much work on the article either, as most edits vandalism and reverts. DiverseMentality 06:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the lead section does not provide a useful overview of the subject, as well as the citation needed templates as well. But other than that, I do not see much else that has been uncited. There are a few sections that have full paragraphs cited to one source, however. If you feel something is not cited, please {{fact}} it. --w^L^{<speak·check>} 08:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added quite a few under 'Music career' alone; from that, I feel it proves the article does not meet the GA criteria. DiverseMentality 23:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be rude, but did you do this properly? I do not see very many comments, and this should of been with Wikipedia:Good article reassessment as "Result Pending". ★Dasani★ 23:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did, read here. DiverseMentality 01:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been two weeks and the article still does not meet the good article criteria and is therefore being delisted. Please address any and all concerns before renominating this article for good article status. Thank you. DiverseMentality 20:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]