Talk:Tilbury Fort/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I would love to review one of your masterpieces. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly well-written as always, so these are mere nitpicks :) Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most changes made, comments left on the others. Thanks for the review! Hchc2009 (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
16th century
  • his wife, Catherine of Aragon Comma after "Aragon"
  • You may consider converting tons, though it is not mandatory.
  • James Nedeham and Christopher Morice Better add their professions to introduce them
  • I struggled to think of a good profession to ascribe to them... Hchc2009 (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Rampart" is linked twice
17th century
  • sixty-six men in 1651 "66" would appear less wordy and better per WP:MOSNUM
  • There's a comparison with the "three" earlier in the line though, so I think this is the preferred MOSNUM format. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
18th–19th centuries
  • I wonder if links are needed for "rainwater" and "cricket"
20th–21st centuries
  • I don't think a hyphen is needed in "down-stream"
Architecture
  • under the direction of Sir Bernard de Gomme You can call him "de Gnomme" everywhere once you have introduced him
  • This is a new section, though, so he needs to be reintroduced. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hchc2009: Please respond. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the changes. I am happy to promote this. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]