This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This source is inappropriate per WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Ancestry.com this discussion at WP:RSN, which explains why this site is not a good source, especially this part of the discussion (findmypast is specifically mentioned in that discussion). Just because a site shows that someone with a given name was born on a given date, doesn't mean it's the same person. It wouldn't be the first time that's happened on Wikipedia by any means. The source is, at best, an assumption, which for a biographical article is unacceptable. Also, just because an admin added something doesn't mean it's infallible. Per WP:BLP: "We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources." If the best we can do is this site, it doesn't need to be included at all. - Aoidh (talk) 01:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're absolutely right. I shall remove my edits. AnemoneProjectors 08:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
