Jump to content

Talk:Tim Bueler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

biased

[edit]

This page seems biased. --Liface 01:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is completely biased.
It was ridiculously biased. I think I cleaned out the worst of it and added appropriate flags for citation. Also, please remember to sign your comments on this page with four tildes, which will be converted into your signature. Mattymatt 00:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are we sure this person even meets the minimum notoriety requirements?76.178.166.179 (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it doesn't meet the minimum notoriety requirements. As I said when I flagged it, it appears to be a friend of the subject writing down bits of information or stories. This subject seems to be relatively non-descript (i.e., just a regular college student)Aceofchaos (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the guilty party who defaced this entry by adding "a notorious spammer" to the first line. I've had it. I have no idea how I got on his distribution list and have requested removal numerous times. The "unsubscribe" feature in his emails is not live andd he doesn't respond to direct requests. I've complained to his host -all to no avail. Hopefully he will see this and put a real unsubscribe link in his emails so I can give his missives the heave ho.Pattern maker (talk) 18:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this guy is notable, I'm adding myself to Wikipedia. I could sneeze three times in a row and that would STILL be more of an accomplishment than this guy has achieved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.106.221 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tim Bueler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]