Jump to content

Talk:Time Capsule (Parks and Recreation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTime Capsule (Parks and Recreation) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTime Capsule (Parks and Recreation) is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 15, 2011Good article nomineeListed
July 21, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 15, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Saturday Night Live comedian Will Forte played a man obsessed with the Twilight series in "Time Capsule", an episode of the NBC comedy series Parks and Recreation?
Current status: Good article

DYK

[edit]

I nominated this for a DYK here. If that was wrong please retract it. cheers--Guerillero | My Talk 06:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

[edit]

There are startling similarities between parts of this episode and the comedy article here - http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/shaggy-butte-mottos.php. This includes the Paris reference as the first motto, and wrongfully claiming to be the birthplace of a celebrity as a motto, then changing the motto as a reference to the mixup after being called on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.95.140 (talk) 07:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is definitely interesting, but we can't include this in the article itself unless and until an actual accusation of plagiarism is made or cited in a WP:RS. Simply linking to the site and claiming there was plagiarism is WP:OR. If a reliable source writes about it, though, it should definitely be part of the article... — Hunter Kahn 14:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]