Talk:Tina McKenzie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTina McKenzie has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTina McKenzie is part of the Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2013Good article nomineeListed
December 8, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Article improvement efforts[edit]

Efforts are being made to add content to this article to get it improved enough to nominate for Good Article. Efforts to improve the article are nominally being based on the article about Lauren Jackson given the sheer amount of information available about female wheelchair basketball players when compared to other sports like goalball. Hence, the article could really use a good copy edit, maintaining as much information as possible for the short term until all the content is in to determine what belongs and does not. The goal is to nominate the article for Good Article by the end of September. In the mean time, the article has also been nominated for Did You Know. --LauraHale (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tina Mckenzie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • I think you could expand the lead to cover how she became a Paralympian.
  • " As of 2012," it's mid-2013 now, do we have an update?
    • No. News is infrequent now that she's retired. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you link Albury, why not St Peters, New South Wales?
  • Suggest linking paraplegia.
  • "Gliders" is mentioned in the infobox but nowhere else.
  • " a result of a fall" presumably "as... " but a fall from what? More detail would be good here.
  • There must be a link for a "guard"?
  • "In 2011/2012," nah, they gave her a grant at a specific point in time, but perhaps "For the 2011–12 season..."?
    • It would be the financial year, being a government grant. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "MacQuarie University" no need for capital Q.
  • "Chancellors Award" apostrophe somewhere I expect?
  • "She is a.." for new sections reintroduce Mckenzie.
  • Is it Mckenzie or McKenzie?
    • Aaaaargggh. It's McKenzie. Had the pages moved. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "three game test series" -> "three-game Test series"?
  • "62-37 " en-dash per WP:DASH.
  • What's "10:47 minutes"? Do you mean 10 minutes, 47 seconds?
  • Standardise the accessdate format for refs.
  • Ref titles need en-dashes rather than hyphens (per WP:DASH).
    • What are ref titles? Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • When you cite a source, you usually use a "title" field, or in simple terms, the headline of the webpage you're using. These should use en-dashes, not hyphens. If it's too problematic, leave me a note and I'll show you what I mean. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

            • When the links decay the first thing I do is run a search on the title. Most of the time, the page has merely moved. Otherwise I have to fish it out of an archive. When we alter the titles, we reduce the chance of being able to find it again. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
              • Most search engines totally ignore punctuation, so there'd be no difference in results between looking for an en-dash or a hyphen. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On-hold "good article" nomination[edit]

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of July 2, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Comments above.
2. Factually accurate?: No issues.
3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, seems okay, although worried about the fact she has a club called "Gliders" in her infobox but no mention of it at all in the article.
4. Neutral point of view?: No worries.
5. Article stability?: Yes.
6. Images?: No problems here.

Let me know when you're through these issues. Thank you for your work so far. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tina McKenzie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]