Talk:Tithonus (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 00:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Polished it up, looks grand to go.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Cleaned up a few instances of the same ref used multiple times consecutively. If a few sentences in a row, or a whole paragraph, stem from a single source, then don't be afraid to just cite it all at once; each sentence doesn't need a citation unless it's a different one being used.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Bunged in an extra review for you to round out the scope a bit.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Grand.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Not an issue.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Grand enough. I'd say drop in a mention of how the desaturation in the non-free image is discussed in the article though. Pity there's no free images of Weegee's work to add an example.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I've fixed anything I saw wrong with this one, so it should be good to go. Going to pass it. Well done. GRAPPLE X 00:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)