Talk:Titus (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Up a grade?[edit]

I added refs, did a search for reviews et cetera and cleaned it up using cquote and stuff. :D Terrasidius (talk) 00:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

There seems to be a bias toward the film with stuff like "hailed for its daring and brave artistic flair" and so forth...--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know, I would say that its just letting the reader know that it was indeed "hailed for its..." blah blah... you know? Any suggestions on alternate ways to say the same thing? I mean the film did receive VERY mixed reviews and both view points are covered here. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(^Ταλκ) 22:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misc[edit]

So, um, the miscellaneous section is kinda miscellaneous and I'm thinking it's pretty much trivia and unnecessary as per that Wikipedia guideline on trivia the name of which I can't recall off the top of my head - you know the one. Anyway, I think it ought to be taken out. Cheers. 70.51.244.34 (talk) 00:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Titus (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091124064311/http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/563 to http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/563

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Titus (film" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Titus (film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Titus (film until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]