This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why is parenthetical disambiguation necessary at all? Toʻylar muborak red links – Wbm1058 (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Originally I thought we need to disambiguate because "Toʻylar muborak!" is a common phrase in Uzbek that means "Happy marriage!" But later I realized that there are no articles about common English phrases such as "Merry Christmas!" Also, the movie has a sequel but it's called Toʻylar muborak 2. So, I think the best thing to do is just move the page to Toʻylar muborak. Nataev (talk) 09:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - nom evidently knows what he's doing with Uzbek articles. With or without "(film)" is fine. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - there's no need to disambiguate at all. Nataeva (talk) 09:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support a move to Toʻylar muborak without the disambiguator. This is not Uzbek Wikipedia and there is no ambiguity. — AjaxSmack 04:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.