Jump to content

Talk:Tobias Wolff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Child abuse victims category

[edit]

I put Wolff in there since if you've read his famous memoir 'This boy's life' he writes about being a victim of child abuse. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BeardedWoof (talkcontribs)

Yes, but that info is not in the article, so I have removed the category. If you would like to add the information to the article, supported by a referenced source, you can restore the category. --ShelfSkewed [Talk] 17:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh brother, this is why Wikipedia sucks. It's fact/common knowledge that Tobias Wolff has been a victim of child abuse, so why shouldn't he be in that category? He wrote about it in his personal memoir that made him famous, and he's also talked about it in personal interviews.—Preceding unsigned comment added by BeardedWoof (talkcontribs)
Then it shouldn't be hard to find a good source for it. And, aside from the fact that a lot of what passes for "common knowledge" is completely wrong, please follow the link in the "biographies of living persons" box above for a better understanding of why potentially contentious issues should be treated with more care than less-controversial information. --ShelfSkewed [Talk] 05:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tobias wolff.jpg

[edit]

Image:Tobias wolff.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unconvincing claims

[edit]

Wolff is a big influence on David Sedaris? I don't see this at all. Neither do I really see the influence of Maupassant on Wolff's writing. I wonder how useful the influence section is.

Furthermore, I am not convinced that it is any longer correct to say that Wolff's novels are a minor strand in his oeuvre. The success of Old School has been considerable. I think it would now be valid to refer to him as a novelist. Macphysto (talk) 11:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On influences, how the hell has Tucker Max ended up in there? Vote to eliminate this box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.171.79 (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 23:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tobias Wolff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I've removed the Wikipedia links for This Boy's Life because it doesn't feel right to have the link for a book link to the film adaptation, plus the film's page doesn't mention the book or Wolff at all beyond passing mention in the first sentence. It's not a helpful link for people consulting an encyclopedia for information about the book. Leopard of the Snows (talk) 04:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Father

[edit]

The father was a con artist who went to prison. He FAKED a degree at a non-existent program, but still was hired as an aeronautical engineer for a major company. It's detailed in his brother, Geoffrey Wolff's book "The Duke of Deception". 75.84.42.25 (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]