This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
@42 marshall: Just wanted to ask why you keep changing the infobox paramaeters and removing stuff from the lead. The infobox documentation clarifies that consensus is to include Test, ODI, FC and LA ahead of T20Is, which I think should be followed unless there's a good reason for it, and here Astle's only played three T20Is and probably won't play many more because he has had such a bad run of it. T20 is far from his speciality. And I'm really not sure why you've been deleting the last sentence of the lead. Can you please use edit summaries and communicate about it rather than just unilaterally removing content?
Per standing convention, I have reverted the infobox to hold FC/LA/Test/ODI stats. In exceptional circumstances it is appropriate to include T20 or T20I stats, but this is not such a case. It is typically done for players that are best known for playing T20 and have played significantly more of those matches than the other formats. Clearly that is not the case for Astle. See Chris Gayle and Brendon McCullum for counter-examples. Harriastalk 06:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would certainly agree that, in this case, LA is more appropriate - those matches form a much more signficant part of Astle's career than the 3 T20I matches. If that were 30 T20I I might consider otherwise.
The template documentation talk archive contains at least one discussion relating to this as does the archive of the cricket project talk - although good luck finding it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
