Talk:Together (Serbia)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 22:46, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 22:46, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

History

• "won 13 seats in the National Assembly of Serbia and City Assembly of Belgrade" it won 13 seats in the NA and CAB or it won 13 seats in the NA and it also won another number of seats in the CAB
  •  Done
• "After its establishment" → "After Together's establishment"
  •  Done
• Per MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE, include the original Serbian text of "green campaign" and "Green wave" immediately after it in parenthesis ("{{lang|sr|original quote}}")
  •  Done
• "at which they invited" → "at which it invited"
  •  Done
• "The Party of Freedom and Justice, Movement of Free Citizens, and Zdravko Ponoš, who was the presidential candidate of the UZPS alliance, eventually participated in the meeting, at which they discussed about establishing closer parliamentary connections." reorganize to have Ponoš mentioned first
  •  Done
• Link Novi Sad
  •  Done
• "turned out" → "turned"
  •  Done
• Replace the semicolon after "violent" with "when an"
  •  Done
• Replace the period after "batons" with a semicolon
  •  Done
• Link Solidarity
  •  Done
• "has took part" → "has taken part"
  •  Done

Ideology and platform

• "an Associated Press journalist" → "a journalist from the Associated Press"
  •  Done
• "workers who protested" what were they protesting?
  • This is mentioned in the sentence next to it.
• Link Kragujevac
  •  Done
• Include original Serbian quote for "Serbia needs prosecutorial courage like of Laura Kövesi", "Serbia needs to form a strategic agreement with the West", and "provide all available institutional material assistance to refugees and victims of the [Russian invasion of Ukraine]" per MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE
  •  Done
• Link Šabac
  •  Done

Organisation

• "this being" → "them being"
  •  Done
• "headquarters are located" → "headquarters is located" HQ is singular in this context
  •  Done

Overall

• Sources are ok
• Focused and broad
• No war edits
• Neutral
• Images are properly licensed

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@Vacant0: I've left some comments for the review. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 23:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

All done. Vacant0 (talk) 12:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

@Vacant0: Everything looks good. Great work, I'll pass this review. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 19:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing! Vacant0 (talk) 19:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)