Talk:Tomb Raider (2013 video game)
Tomb Raider (2013 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 9, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 555 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Tomb Raider (2013 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.computerandvideogames.com/394018/features/tomb-raider-guide-10-essential-tips-for-becoming-a-survivor/
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=1000676653
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130228023136/http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/18407tomb-raider-ps3-review/ to http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/18407tomb-raider-ps3-review/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gfkhitlist.com/game.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625050425/http://www.shortlist.com/entertainment/gaming/the-shortlist-best-of-e3-awards to http://www.shortlist.com/entertainment/gaming/the-shortlist-best-of-e3-awards
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Outdated link
[edit]"He cited mostly negligible differences between the two versions, but noted a smoother frame-rate on the PS4 version.[1]"
The URL has changed to: https://www.gameinformer.com/games/tomb_raider_definitive_edition/b/playstation4/archive/2014/01/24/tomb-raider-definitive-edition-review-game-informer.aspx
Should I also change the access date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichalZim (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Helgeson, Matt (24 January 2014). "Tomb Raider review: Lara's never looked better". Game Informer. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- @MichalZim: Accessdate indicates the last time someone checked the source and verified it supported the statements it was used to cite. So if you've checked the source, then you can update the accessdate to today. Remember to sign your posts with ~~~~. Sections only need two =s around them as well on talk pages, not four. -- ferret (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- GA-Class video game articles
- Mid-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report