Talk:Tomlinson's Cyclopaedia of Useful Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

Merge proposal[edit]

The 1866 Tomlinson's is a largely different work than the 1852 version (38% larger). The scholarship is a decade later.

Although I own a copy of the 1866 version, I don't own a copy of the 1852 version.

It would be nice to have the guidance of an editor who has access to both — it's possible the other article is written from a bookseller's synopsis, and not by a Wiki editor who's read it. There's "marketing" language which -- I'm guessing -- either inappropriately describes the focus of the 1852 edition ("devised to celebrate the Great Exhibition" and "enormous range of topics from a British perspective") or describes a work which substantially differs.

There are some related issues in the "Cyclopedia" discussion Section "Old and New versions of cyclopedia" [1]

Regards, Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]