Talk:Too Short a Season/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 03:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Got this one! Ruby 2010/2013 03:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Just a quick note to say that I added an extra paragraph on the makeup under the Production section this morning - I realised after the nomination that I'd neglected to check one of the source books. Miyagawa (talk) 11:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Review[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- Plot section: links for Enterprise and Mordan IV?
- I was confused by your use of MacGuffin and had to follow the link. It might be good to offer a brief definition for readers
- I notice a lot of repetition of similar words within the same sentence that could a copy edit (See for instance "One significant change she made was to make the change..." and "...Rohner and director Rob Bowman worked together on weekends to work...")
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Direct quotes should immediately be followed by a citation
- What makes Trek Today and Tower Video reliable sources? I'm not familiar with them.
- Trek Today is part of TrekNation, which is a long-standing website owned by UGO Networks and the Hearst Corporation. It had been previously used in the successful FA nomination of These Are the Voyages..., which included articles by Michelle Green (the reviewer here). Tower Video is an imprint of Tower Records which was a massive international chain which went into bankruptcy back in 2006 and now only exists online. Miyagawa (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Any insight on the meaning behind the title?
- Any ratings data out there you can use?
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Some recent edits but that's to be expected as it was recently nominated. Nothing I see as a strike against promotion.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The above comments are a preliminary review. The article is close to passing but there are just a few issues that need to be resolved first. Please post here when you have fixed the issues or have responded to my comments. Well done bringing the article from this to its current state! Ruby 2010/2013 03:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)