Talk:Tool discography

Tool discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 18, 2008	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Discographies

This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles

Tool (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tool, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ToolWikipedia:WikiProject ToolTemplate:WikiProject ToolTool articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Opiate[edit]

Somebody should update Opiate and say it's platinum on the discography page. It should be like the regular albums that state what platinum certification the album is. If the opiate page has it with a platinum certification then the discography page should have it.

Discrepancies[edit]

Missing the Demo by "Tool" entitled "Toolshed" released 1991 A-Side:

01 - Cold & Ugly
02 - Hush
03 - Part of Me

B-Side:

04 - Crawl Away
05 - Sober
06 - Jerk-Off

Links:

http://www.mp3.ua/album.aspx?id=10182 [Online Sale Link]
http://www.mininova.org/tor/203284 [Torrent Download]
http://cgi.ebay.com/TOOL-1991-Demo-Cassette-72826-SEALED-RARE-No-Reserve_W0QQitemZ270084025601QQihZ017QQcategoryZ1600QQcmdZViewItem [eBay Sale]
I would list more sources, but I'm lazy. Go look for yourself - whoever monitors this page should probably update it. I'll leave it to them.

-nitro glycerine (Feb 2, 2007)

I have a version of the Wings song "Silly Love Songs" called "Silly Little Love Songs" which purports to be by Tool - anyone know if this is really Tool? If so, we should add it to the discography somewhere. I don't know enough about it to really know, though. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 01:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would most likely the version Maynard sang on a Replicants cover off of their one album. There is a plethora of Tool-related stuff that could be added if this is the appropriate place (Maynard has a bunch of appearances with other groups, RATM, Deftones etc etc). Cheers! Ibanez Guy (talk) 06:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aenima2.JPG[edit]

Image:Aenima2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PARABOLABIG.jpg[edit]

Image:PARABOLABIG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SCHISMBIG.jpg[edit]

Image:SCHISMBIG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Format change suggestion[edit]

I think it would be clearer to read if we used the Discography template instead of tables, which I've always viewed as being messy and cluttered. This is a pretty neat template. Does anyone else have thoughts about this?

Here's an example...

Undertow

Released: April 6, 1993
Format: CD
Label: Zoo/BMG/Volcano: USA
Producer: Sylvia Massy
Chart position: Billboard 200 #50 on November 06, 1993
Certification: Double platinum
Singles: "Prison Sex", "Sober"

= ∫_t^c 5th Eye 17:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charted songs[edit]

Why are "Hush" and "Maynard's Dick" listed when they have no chart positions? –Pomte 21:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To-do[edit]

Copy-edit lead for prose.
Check for additional chart positions and expand tables accordingly.
Table DVDs.
Check if Tributes are relevant for this list, if so table the section?

Lara❤Love 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chart positions[edit]

Albums: See issue with AU positions

Lateralus - UK Top 40 - #16 - [1]
10,000 Days - UK Top 40 - #4 - [2] (search artist Tool - Albums)
Lateralus - AU - #1 - [3]
10,000 Days - AU - #1 - [4]
Salival - AU - #29 - [5]
Lateralus - AU - #9 - [6]
10,000 Days - AU - #1 - [7]
Lateralus - FR - #21 - [8]
10,000 Days - FR - #7 - [9]
AEnima - NOR - #36 - [10]
Lateralus - NOR - #2 - [11]
10,000 Days - NOR - #1 - [12]
Lateralus - SWI - #31 - [13]
10,000 Days - SWI - #3 - [14]
Undertow - NAD - #89 - [15]
AEnima - NAD - #75 - [16]
Lateralus - NAD - #7 - [17]
10,000 Days - NAD - #1 - [18]
Undertow - NZ - #17 - [19]
AEmima - NZ - #1 - [20]
Lateralus - NZ - #2 - [21]
10,000 Days - NZ - #1 - [22]
AEmina - SWE - #53 - [23]
Lateralus - SWE - #8 - [24]
10,000 Days - SWE - #2 - [25]
AEnima - GER - #75 - [26]
Lateralus - GER - #5 - [27]
10,000 Days - GER - #2 - [28]
Lateralus - FIN - #11 - [29]
10,000 Days - FIN - #2 - [30]
Lateralus - AUT - #9 - [31]
10,000 Days - AUT - #1 - [32]
Lateralus - CAN - #1 - [33]
10,000 Days - CAN - #1 [34]
Lateralus - World Charts - #28 - [35]
10,000 Days - World Charts - #1 - [36]

Songs

"Vicarious" - World Charts - #71 - [37]

Certifications

US RIAA Gold and Platinum - Tool - [38]
CAN RIAA Gold and Platinum - Tool - [39]

Lara❤Love 18:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broken references[edit]

See Talk:A Perfect Circle discography#Broken references. That discography was built off of this one. A lot of the same references were used, and it appears these sites have gone down. This is something that will probably affect a lot of music articles. لenna vecia 05:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. It must have been a temporary issue. They're all up now. لenna vecia 19:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

72826[edit]

Needs to be fixed: The Tool Template lists 72826 as an EP, whereas the 72826 article calls it a 'demo-tape'. If it really is an EP, it should also belong on this page. And if it's just a demo-tape, then I really don't know what needs to be done with it. But I just thought this information needs to be noted. -TOM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.128.91.240 (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tool discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090617152343/http://www.grammy.com/grammy_Awards/Winners/ to http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tool discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tool discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924113947/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?&artist=%22Tool%22 to https://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?&artist=%22Tool%22

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tool discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]