Talk:Tooth-to-tail ratio

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military logistics and medicine task force

Poor stub

This is messy. The article fails to explain adequately why the ratio matters. According to the article, high ratios i) are correlated with low technological capabilities, ii) mean undersupply and iii) are the objective of DARPA for the sake of efficiency. ii) and iii) are at odds, and i) lacks data to back it up (information lacking, one could as well think advanced militaries are capable of reaching the optimal effectiveness level with less support personnel). Perhaps the biggest issue is that i) and iii) are stated with the unwritten assumption that the measures are made for optimal effectiveness levels (and they would be comparable among militaries), while ii) considers there is no such a thing as an optimal effectiveness and different ratios necessarily relate to better or worse supply (and maybe to how well the tooth performs? Hard to say in the current state).

Additionally, the only reference in the article is a dead link that does not properly support the statement it goes with.

I don't think there would be any harm done if this article was nominated for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.213.80.19 (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tooth-to-tail ratio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.darpa.mil/stratvision.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Expansion Suggestion

If someone is interested in expanding this article this .pdf Tooth to Tail (T3R) in Modern Militaries might provide them with a good starting point. I think it's only available from US IP addresses but it can also be found here. --Boreas74 ^{You'll catch more flies with honey} 15:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]