Talk:Topological graph theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Example studies[edit]

I know this article should more closely follow the house style for a mathmatics article. In that case this section would be next to last before the references section. The next step is to include a more formal definition of this hybrid specialty between topology and graph theory. Vonkje 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References Section[edit]

I added a references section to hold footnotes that were embedded in previous sections. I believe footnoting that binds specific parts of the text to its reference is better scholarship than listing references. Simply listing references makes it harder for someone else to check my work. Vonkje 01:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irreducible[edit]

Is there a notion of irreducible graphs (and trees) in terms of topology (rather than series-reduction in terms of vertices having exactly two links)? Cesiumfrog (talk) 11:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pappus graph animation should be removed[edit]

The Pappus graph animation is not well done.

It is impossible to understand what is happening, and at the end it allows no time at all for the viewer to appreciate the final result.

As it is, it does not belong in this article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:ADE7:E1E3:C288:E288 (talk) 01:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]