Talk:Touch Me (Rui da Silva song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Merge[edit]

  • I haven't heard the Cass Fox version of 'Touch Me', so am not in a position to say, but if it is very different from the Rui Da Silva version (ie done in a completely different musical style, ie jazz or blues, rather than dance/house like the RdS version) then it probably shouldn't be merged, as they are 2 different but related songs. I'll try and get a copy of her album and have a listen within the next week or so.Jaganath 23:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • totally diferent interpretations of the same song it should not be linked..... 90.193.6.34 13:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disagree - Shouldn't be merged, are almost completely different song. Chappy84 14:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:SONGS and music guidelines. It does not matter whether it "sounds different" or performed in a different musical style. Articles are about SONGS - i.e., not about SINGLES. An encyclopedia article about a SONG explains the different ways artists interpret it and the evolution of different versions. Covers, remixes, re-issues, etc. do not get their own articles - they are all explained in one encyclopedia entry. - eo 13:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Well, Idk, you don't merge 80's nostalgia movement into 80's culture article cause it's something pretty much enirely new based on that. Well idk then you could just as well merge Human into Chimpanzee. That's how I perceive it. 354d 01:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spandau Ballet[edit]

The part about the Spandau Ballet-inspired riff needs to be reworked...the track DOES have the riff, I remember it clearly when it first hit the radio, also Gary Kemp has a writing credit which indicates the finished track does contain that content. Go listen to the track on YouTube, the riff is clearly there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:7E60:4800:7C3A:D6C6:3E14:EF3D (talk) 01:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]