This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
I'm not all that comfortable about that. Do we know she is a lesbian? Maybe she's bisexual, and just happens to have had relationships with other women. Sleeping with someone of the same sex is not necessarily the same as being homosexual: cf the difference between "Men who sleep with men" and "Gay men"; they're not quite the same thing. 86.149.2.187 15:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
user comment )))) --- i find the article faily bias against her, i cite the comment about same sex affairs which is obviouly trying to slander her by pointing her out as a lesbian ( OMFGWTFBBQface) and the general tone of the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.136.190 (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. It's a little misleading and not really necessary, so I went ahead and removed it. Also misleading, and rather amusing, was the fact that the link to Jane Andrews re-directed to Anne of Green Gables. Figured I might as well get rid of that one, too. Midnight Bliss (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A link to the Jane Andrews site could be of interest/curiosity in the context of controversial young women murderers of the same name, since the two of them did meet and were victims of attempted poisoning in the same incident at Send Prison in January 2008. 86.176.178.94 (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Following the last, Jane Andrews will be in the news again soon, as her release comes up for review. You might consider restoring the link to her site (which links to this one), and which is now more substantial anyway. 86.182.164.109 (talk) 01:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The line "Andrews has saved the life of a fellow prisoner who attempted suicide, and this sparked fears that she could be out on parole even sooner than the trial judge had recommended."
Fears? Who fears the release of this woman early? "Even sooner"? Sooner than what? 14 years? She isn't a serial killer. This is the kind of subjective, emotive, POV terminology you'd expect to find in The Sun. Wiki shouldn't be used as a campaign platform to keep anyone in prison longer than determined by the due process of law. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.246.71.166 (talk) 10:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
