Talk:Traction power network

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Traction power network article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Query[edit]

What is the reason for employing lower frequency power for traction usage? LorenzoB 18:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A bit beyond my technical knowledge, i'm afraid. Pickle 00:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the distribution system, but much of it has to do with the characteristics of AC motors. On a DC distribution system, the AC to DC conversion was once commonly done using rotary converters, which run in synchronism with the AC input, and it was apparently less stressful on the machinery to have it running at 25 hertz than at 50 or 60 hertz. Once all of the substations go to solid-state equipment, though, this advantage is eliminated, and it's not uncommon to convert to local mains frequency and eliminate the separate traction network.

On AC distribution systems, the motors on the rolling stock might need a lower frequency in order to start effectively from a stop, depending on how they are built and connected. The lower frequency means less difference between a dead stop and synchronous speed, so again, potentially less stress on the equipment. My trusty Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers fails me on the details, but does point out the common application (in 1941) of 25 hertz systems in the United States, and 15 and 16 2/3 hertz systems in Europe. --Morrand 22:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And because wound traction motors can be built to run on low-frequency AC, giving the good characteristics of a series DC motor but allowing generation by alternators and transmission step-up and step-down by transformers. Electric motor #Universal motors Meggar 01:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

Stupid, mergers do not contribute to additional content. What about proper referencing instead of administering the formalisms? Wireless friend (talk) 08:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Special Photo request[edit]

Please take a photograph near Mehedeby in Sweden, where HVDC Fenno-Skan 2 crosses traction powerline Gävle-Tierp. This is the only crossing point of HVDC powerline and single-phase AC powerline in the world.

It is requested that a photograph of Fenno-Skan2 and traction power line at Mehedeby be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Sweden may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload