Talk:TransApex

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal TransApex is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

This sentence "Initial reports have speculated that the toll would be (2007 dollars) AU$3.70. This toll will be more than twice the $2.00 toll as promised by Mr Newman when the tunnel is eventually open." appears inconsistent. How is $3.70 more than twice $2.00?--121.45.247.205 (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the sentance "This massive blowout calls into question all of Mr Newman's pre-election costings." as it does not conform to neutrality rules. JadeSin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Plan or idea?

The article paints TransApex as part of a urban infrastructure plan. However there are few if any planning documents for the city or region which called for five road tunnels to be built preceding its development. A better way to characterise the project is as a political initiative as explained on page 11 of the book A climate for growth. I propose that the use of the word 'plan' to describe the project as a whole be replaced by the word 'initiative'. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]