Talk:Translational Backus–Naur form
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Translational Backus–Naur form article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Translational Backus–Naur form. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130710085600/http://lrstar.org:80/ to http://lrstar.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Initial remarks
[edit]At first glance, this article seems rather confusing. Some particular points that are unclear about the subject:
- Are TBNFs supposed to be about building the abstract syntax tree, or do they aim to support more arbitrary transdunctions? The example details make it seem like it is translating an Algol-style language to assembly code, which is going further than just parsing.
- Are the various emit statements correct, or have they been garbled? Several linebreaks seem strange.
- How is the priority section to be interpreted? Normally priority is enforced in the grammar, and that is done for the relation class of operations but not for distinguishing plus and minus from times and divide!
- What is the meaning of the
...
that is sometimes suffixed to nonterminals in the grammar? Why are some nonterminals with angle brackets and some without?
And all of that is just from looking at it for 5 minutes! There are probably more problems. 130.243.68.115 (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles