Talk:Treatise on Natural Philosophy
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism by Schopenhauer
[edit]Cutler, in the text it says:
In 1851 Arthur Schopenhauer derided T and T as a "splendid example of":
Two things: 1) Should this read "T and T'"? Although in general I think referring to them directly by name would be more appropriate as the comment predates the work. 2) Similarly, should this be reworded to note that the reference is to their writing in general and not to this work? Seeing as it was printed in 1851 and the work did not come out til many years later. MKV (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Stub-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- Stub-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- Stub-Class physics publications articles
- Physics publications articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class history of science articles
- Top-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles