Talk:Tres Personajes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In March 2010 an anonymous editor complained that this article focuses (to the article's detriment) on the theft of the painting rather than on the painting itself.

Perhaps someone could find out more about it? DS (talk) 00:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote a bit more about it (impeccably sourced), but there isn't that much to say; it's an abstract, so trying to describe it is Original Research, it reflects what the viewer wants to see in it. Maybe we could try to stick a photo of the painting itself in, under a Fair Use claim. --GRuban (talk) 18:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tres Personajes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]