Talk:Trevor Rabin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changes to Yes section[edit]

I have just restored the Yes section to the version it was on in early July, before someone edited it for a "fact-based, neutral tone". While there are a few somewhat opinionated remarks in that version I believe that at most one or two of them fail to meet Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines.

The edit in question cannot be accurately described as only creating a more neutral tone. It also

  • (Re)introduced the LEAST fact-based, neutral remark in the article at the time, namely that Union "comes across as strictly a corporate decision".
  • Introduced a lot of choppy, laundry-list style sentences that read very poorly; the newly-restored section reads much more engagingly. ("Neutral" need not mean "boring"!)
  • Changed some sentences for no obvious reason at all in ways that made them grammatically incorrect
  • Made chronological sequence unclear in some places
  • Deleted some sentences without removing later remarks that referred back to them, creating several spots where the article no longer made sense.
  • Removed information, such as the (lack of) chart showing of the Can't Look Away singles, for no obvious reason.

Improvements this section still needs would include sourcing the claims in it. I know most of them to be true but would be hard-pressed to properly cite this at the moment. I will also reintroduce some corrections to dates and cities made since July. 99.28.109.0 (talk) 05:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now made some further improvements including removing several of the above-noted opinionated remarks. Also, I would like to note that the first bullet point above is incorrect; that remark was not introduced by the edit I mentioned, merely left alone by it. However, that is still a strange decision given the stated motives behind that edit.

Spleen[edit]

Wasn't Rabin kicked in the spleen around the time Yes' 90125 was released? My recollection is that the injury meant he couldn't physically hang upside-down for the "Leave It" video (though I'm not sure why they wouldn't achieve the same effect by simply turning the camera upside-down). Less likely, but again from memory, is that it turned out he had more than one spleen. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did find a couple of mentions (only about the spleen injury) in old newspapers: [1],[2] -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed this was the same as the "large woman" incident mentioned in the article. 24.79.207.140 (talk) 21:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RabinFamily.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:RabinFamily.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

An IPA guide or something should be added to his name. Is it "Rabin" (short A as in "cat") or "Ray-bin"? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Birth name[edit]

I have seen on a few web sites that Rabin was born Trevor Charles Rabinowitz. Is this true? LowSelfEstidle (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trevor Rabin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]