Talk:Trifluridine/tipiracil
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Trifluridine/tipiracil.
|
content deleted
[edit]I had my most of my article on TAS-102 deleted and the explanation was "remove load of content based on primary sources". I was wondering what that means? I felt the information was relevant to the drug and explained studies pertinent to its development and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The sources I obtained my information from were also from legitimate scientific journals that were essentially published results of the clinical trials conducted with the drug. Ukystu85 (talk) 02:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please read WP:MEDRS and especially the section, "Respect secondary sources". If you want to read more about why MEDRS exists, you could look at a draft essay i wrote (too long right now, needs trimming, sorry) here: User:Jytdog/Why_MEDRS?. Jytdog (talk) 03:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)