Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.)

Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.) has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 18, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review and take your time. APK whisper in my ear 09:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another article which is in good shape overall. Some comments:

Lead: ...the parish bought a nearby lot...: maybe word this to better reinforce to the reader that this is the site at the northeast corner of 3rd and C Streets NW, but without mentioning the actual address (that may be undue repetition). I was thinking along the lines of "the parish bought the lot with which the church is best associated..." or something to that effect.
New sanctuary: (1818-1895): date ranges should be separated by an endash, not a hyphen. That said, I don't think it necessary to include the date range anyway, no other named individual is treated this way and the reader can simply follow the link itself for dob/dod information.
New sanctuary: designing the new building.: suggest "to design the new building."
Later history: The Evening Star stated "an innovation in such structures will be a kitchen, thing whose...: there should be a cite at the end of this quote. Also, I think there may be a missing word. Should that be "...a kitch, something whose..."
Later history: A renovation from 1897-1898: As above, endash instead of the hyphen for date ranges.
Demolition: The Washington Post reported "Many venerable ...: there should be a cite at the end of this quote.
Image tags check out OK.

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done APK whisper in my ear 00:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This looks all good. I am passing this as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]