Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.)
Appearance
![]() | Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.) has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 18, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I will review. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for another review and take your time. APK whisper in my ear 09:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Another article which is in good shape overall. Some comments:
- Lead: ...the parish bought a nearby lot...: maybe word this to better reinforce to the reader that this is the site at the northeast corner of 3rd and C Streets NW, but without mentioning the actual address (that may be undue repetition). I was thinking along the lines of "the parish bought the lot with which the church is best associated..." or something to that effect.
- New sanctuary: (1818-1895): date ranges should be separated by an endash, not a hyphen. That said, I don't think it necessary to include the date range anyway, no other named individual is treated this way and the reader can simply follow the link itself for dob/dod information.
- New sanctuary: designing the new building.: suggest "to design the new building."
- Later history: The Evening Star stated "an innovation in such structures will be a kitchen, thing whose...: there should be a cite at the end of this quote. Also, I think there may be a missing word. Should that be "...a kitch, something whose..."
- Later history: A renovation from 1897-1898: As above, endash instead of the hyphen for date ranges.
- Demolition: The Washington Post reported "Many venerable ...: there should be a cite at the end of this quote.
- Image tags check out OK.
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Done APK whisper in my ear 00:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- This looks all good. I am passing this as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- GA-Class Anglicanism articles
- Low-importance Anglicanism articles
- GA-Class Christianity articles
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles