Talk:Triumph Daytona 675
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Triumph Daytona 675 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Reception[edit]
I know the list of awards in the reception area are very likely true, but this article is the only article I've come by that list awards and doesn't list sources. See here, here, here, here, here, here, and here for examples. So this means we need to get cited sources for all of the awards listed here. I'm going to tag the section and remove all unsourced claims next week. roguegeek (talk·cont) 18:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Please do. Awards can be added as they are discovered down the line. Revisethis (talk) 07:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
2009: Sales Pitch?[edit]
"Add to this new front monobloc radial callipers and radial master cylinder that deliver track bred stopping power. For 2009 the engine management system has been calibrated to accept our new accessory quick-shifter."
This reads like a sales pitch - and a pretty badly-written one - rather than impartial information. Especially with the inclusion of "calibrated to accept OUR new accessory quick-shifter". 195.234.243.2 (talk) 10:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
675R[edit]
We should include somewhere info on the new 675R model with ohlins at front and back 87.194.223.183 (talk) 03:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)