Talk:Tropical Depression One-E (2009)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I have no idea what this means—"According to officials in Mexico, the formation and impact of the depression near and in Sinaloa has never been recorded before."

Reworded Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
What happened to the depression after it degenerated? When did the remains move ashore? Did any moisture affect inland areas?

Added where it moved ashore, other than that, there is no information on where the remnants went. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Alt text would be nice, but not required for GA.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Nice work overall. I'm putting this on-hold for now to allow the above issues to be addressed. I look forward to being able to promote this. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the two issues Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]