Talk:Tropical Storm Aletta (2006)
Appearance
|
Todo
[edit]Get rid of nautical miles, finish adding non-breaking spaces, and double check for any more info (Spanish sources!). ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Aletta (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and I should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything looks great, so I am passing this article to GA status. Congrats on another good article! Dana boomer (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and the copyedits! –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Merge?
[edit]@Yellow Evan: - the content from this article has been merged into the season sub-section. There is nothing substantial still in this article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)