Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Chris (1982)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTropical Storm Chris (1982) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTropical Storm Chris (1982) is part of the 1982 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Todo

[edit]

Yet another low importance article.... Alright. More lede, first. More clarification would be good for the storm history; in the third sentence, what started moving to the west, the upper-level low or the surface low. Overall, a thorough copyedit would be good. A lot of the impact drags way too much, aside from the fact it is pretty disorganized. It's mostly just rainfall stats, and it doesn't really mean that much. The HPC rainfall map would be a good addition. However, there just doesn't feel like a lot of information, there. Perhaps it should be merged? The season article would easily be able to handle it. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd only support merging if all the useful information here can be included in the other article. Otherwise, keep this as a subarticle of the other season article.--Alabamaboy 00:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Chris (1982)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contribs) 00:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC) I'll get to this in just a little bit. – TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice,fiction, and lists):
    See below for comments.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lede

[edit]
  1. Tropical Storm Chris caused minor flooding along the Gulf Coast of the United States. → Tropical Storm Chris caused minor flooding along the Gulf Coast of the United States in September of 1982.
  2. Try not to use the name "Chris" in the lede so much.
  3. There was rainfalls as high as 16 inches (410 mm) in the southern parts and slightly less as the storm progressed northward. — This sentence as a whole is confusing, and the first portion of it is grammatically incorrect.
  4. Elsewhere, impact was limited mostly light to moderate rainfall, though local flooding was reported in Tennessee and Kentucky. — I think you are missing a word here?

Meteorological history

[edit]
  1. Around reaching its peak, Chris made landfall near Sabine Pass, Port Arthur, Texas. — "Around when" isn't very "technical". How about "Shortly before (or after)".
  2. After moving inland, Chris initially weakened quickly, and was downgraded to a tropical depression by early on September 12 while centered over west-central Louisiana — I'd remove the word "initially" because it never slowed down weakening.
  3. Fifteen hours after that, a gale warning was released for Port Arthur to Port O'Connor, Texas. — "after that" → "afterwards".

Summary

[edit]

I have to say, I am impressed with how well-written the rest of the article is. More points towards your WikiCup count. :-) – TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 01:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Chris (1982). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Chris_(1982)&oldid=1211233437"