Talk:Tropical Storm Delia (1973)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I did a bit of copyediting but the prose looks good generally.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I'm a bit concerned that there's so much info about naming trivia in the second paragraph of the lead. Could this be removed?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Great article overall. Putting this on-hold to allow for my sole concern to be addressed. Shouldn't take more than a few minutes to fix up. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Much better. Thanks! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)