Talk:Tropical Storm Etau (2009)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Note: This Article needs a slight update before its GAN is passed Jason Rees (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• 3 Public domain images (hosted at Commons) ok.
• Meteorological history: winds peaked at 95 km/h (60 mph 10-minute sustained) and a barometric pressure of 990 hPa (mbar).[12] - the infobox says the winds peaked at 75 km/h + pressure bottomed at 992 hPa

 DoneJason Rees (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• Preparations: evacuated roughly 47,000 residents from western regions along the coast - do you know where specifically the evacuations took place? Is this a separate evacuation than the In Hyogo state, another 2,000 people were evacuated...
  • As far as i am aware they were seperate but i cant check with the primary author to check as he is rather [off at me for some reason]Jason Rees (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Since this assertion that it was a further 2,000 people cannot be verified by the provided references, it fails Wikipedia:Verifiability --maclean (talk) 19:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Ive removed it for now If cyclonebiskit canverify they were seperate he can add them back in.Jason Rees (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
        • Removed what? Nothing has been removed. --maclean (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
          • Actually it has been removed Unless im missing something?.Jason Rees (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
            • ok. maclean (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
• Make spelling of Hyōgo Prefecture consistent.

 DoneJason Rees (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• Do you know if there has been any update on the 2 missing people?

  Im trying to keep an eye on damages of the PTS and their hasnt been any update on the 2 missing that ive seen.Jason Rees (talk) 17:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

--maclean (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)