Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Olaf (1997)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References appear to be in order and article complies to WP:OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Article covers major aspects while remaining focused on its subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article conforms to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images comply to fair use requirements and are properly captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Summary: I have found that this article complies to all the requirements for a Good Article without any issues. As such, I am happy to pass it for GA status.

Thanks a lot! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]