Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Vamei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleTropical Storm Vamei is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 26, 2016.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 28, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 9, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
March 24, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 23, 2005.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Typhoon Vamei formed only 92 nautical miles north of the equator, a record at the time?
Current status: Featured article

Paper on formation

[edit]

I was looking through the JTWC site and found a link to this paper describing the formation of this storm. There's also a radar pic of the eye from the USS Carl Vinson in the JTWC ATCR.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 15:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA

[edit]

This article has passed, and is now a good article. It is now recommended to record major changes etc. Iolakana|T 19:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that need to be addressed. I have made minor corrections and have included several points below that need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. Please address them within seven days and the article will maintain its GA status. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted. If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. This article covers the topic well and if the above issues are addressed, I believe the article can remain a GA.

  1. The majority of the information in the "Storm history" section is not sourced save for one inline citation. It is recommended that there is a citation for each paragraph for the information presented and after each direct statistic or quote.

Also need inline citations:

  1. "The majority of what little damage occurred involved ships that were caught off guard by the unexpected power of the storm.[citation needed]"
  2. "Because of a unique formation and track, the name "Vamei" was retired and replaced with "Peipah"."

I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. I will leave messages on the talk pages of the main contributors to the article along with related WikiProjects so that the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sounds like I can fix this. I will when I can, which is soon. I think. icelandic hurricane #12(talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like Hurricanehink is doing a good job addressing the issues. Kindly keep us updated on the progress of this article. --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit]

Superb job on addressing the above issues. I believe the article continues to meet the GA criteria and the article will keep its status. Continue to improve the article with any available information, ensuring that it is properly sourced and neutral. I have added an article history of the article to reflect this review. I hope that any future holds for similar articles during GA sweeps are fixed as well as this one. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Vamei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should we include the definition?

[edit]

Vamei means laughingthrush. Shoud we mention this in the article, or does it go off topic and shouldn't be mentioned? SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see the need to include the definition of Vamei, unless we can prove that it really did mean laughingthrush when it was nominated in 1999.Jason Rees (talk) 14:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source for definition: an archive of the Typhoon Naming List.[1] SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "List of names for tropical cyclones adopted by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee for the western North Pacific and the South China Sea (Archived)". web.archive.org. Retrieved 2022-11-22. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)