Talk:Troy Buswell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Western Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Troy Buswell is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Work in progress. I'll be out all day, but will finish when I get back. Orderinchaos 23:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone else try a bare ref conversion for this page? It keeps giving off an edit conflict warning for some reason. Timeshift (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we try to balance the Liberal/Labor articles out a little? It's fine for Buswell's controversies to be listed here like this, but go take a look at Alan Carpenter's entry - No mention of the blouse lifting/bra exposing incident whatsoever.70.180.211.82 (talk) 18:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Different cases. Buswell's controversies have been given substance by the existence of witnesses not afraid to talk to the media. Relevant witnesses to Carpenter's alleged blouse lifting incident have so far dismissed it as baseless.--Armyable (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the Party going forward, boldly

A few days ago, I made these edits:

removed some unnecessary bolding of text
deleted paragraph about personal leave - this text has subsequently been removed or and merged into other text.
deleted the meaningless "going forward"
uncapitalised "party" because it's not a proper noun here
uncapitalised "dry"

Another editor then reverted all of these edits with the comment "Relevant". I'm assuming that the intent was to restore the "personal leave" text, it being relevant to current events, and that the reversion of all the other edits was simply a mistake. Thus I'm re-applying the other edits (eg removing the excess bold, capitalisation, "going forward"). If anyone disagrees with those edits, I ask that we discuss them on the talk page. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

go back and join the circus/zoo if you wish - every dog is joining in now anyways - well beyond that point by now... somewhat belated... satusuro 12:44, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies: Sources

It seems to me that the article could be substantially improved if the list of 7 different controversies between 2008 and 2012 that it refers to didn't all cite the same source. Wouldn't separate sources from the times at which the allegations in question where individually made be more appropriate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.110.66 (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{sofixit}}. Moondyne (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Please tread carefully. Note that this article is about the subject, not what others think or speculate about the subject, particularly given the circumstances. Moondyne (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the interests of WP:BLP, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:RECENTISM, I think it prudent that we not mention every detail about Buswell's life (especially without a source), as it happens. At least wait until the legal process is finished. Mitch Ames (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

While it's not been before a court, the accusations (and accompanying evidence) of plagiarism are, in my opinion, very important as they bring his integrity and honesty into question. Agree with the 'tread carefully' comment above, but the evidence and commentary from reliable sources is very compelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.179.13 (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Troy Buswell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080506032134/http://www.news.com.au:80/perthnow/story/0,21598,23646277-948,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,23646277-948,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Cookshat, I removed content from the Controversies section that was a copyright violation from this source. It was a copy-paste from two sentences from that article.

If you'd like to paraphrase the content, here's a template that is also helpful for formatting the citation information: <ref>{{cite news|url= |title= | author= |date= |website= |accessdate=22 March 2017}}</ref>

Thank you CaroleHenson, I do appreciate the assistance. As you can see i am not a professional editor but can add some local insight and knowledge of Western Australia. Cookshat (talk) 07:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333, sorry to bother you a second time today, but do we need to remove the line from the revision history where the copyrighted content was added?

Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]