Talk:TrueDelta
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Talk:TrueDelta Article has numerous external sources from unrelated parties to validate and attest to the accuracy of the information given. Included additionally in the external links are a television news report from an established Fox 2 news television outlet. Amalga-nation (talk) 03:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
The site also meets the notability guidelines based again on the Fox 2 news report and the article for the Examiner, as well as multiple other web articles listed by third parties about the site. Additionally the site's large user base of more then 30k registered users shows its significance. The area in which the site participates (statistical analysis of user survey data for cars) is a limited area, with only a few major players of which Consumer Reports is one. Very few other sites exist that claim independent statistical analysis of vehicle history and gas mileage. Amalga-nation (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]
This page should not be speedily deleted because... When I wrote this more than 10 years ago I didn't know what I was doing, but I felt that this was a factual article then. I had at the time recently concluded a phone conversation with Dr. Karesh regarding his PhD dissertation which was about the data used to create the website mentioned. I felt it needed an article. The site still exists, and while I do not know the business status of the site, whether for-profit, or non-profit, I do think it is still a useful resource, one which I have also personally contributed data towards and used, without having to pay for. Unfortunately I do not have time to re-write it, so hopefully the community can do what is needed. There have been a lot of contributions since I started it.--Amalga-nation (talk) 12:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)