Talk:True North (Once Upon a Time)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 17:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Oh, hey, Krycek.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    "in a parallel with the story of Hansel and Gretel (Lord/Collins)" -> I'd say it's already implied that the kids fit these roles, so I'd drop the bracketed bit here.
    "who invites him to hang out." -> seems a little informal.
    " [in 'The Price of Gold']" -> both source and MOS use double quote marks ("The Price of God"), so stick with that.
    "as Young Peter Bishop and Young Olivia Dunham" -> "as younger versions of Peter Bishop and Olivia Dunham"
    "It earned a 3.3/8 among adults between the ages of 18 and 49," -> include a link to Nielsen rating and explain what the numbers mean (% of sets in use/total population)
    "'ong enough to watch 'True North.'"" -> dropping the single quotes and adding italics would be an acceptable typographical change.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Grand
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Although it does seem complicated, I'm wondering if the plot section is a little long.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Yep
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Fine
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are grand.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Not a lot of work to be done here, on hold for seven days. GRAPPLE X 20:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know the plot is a bit long, but I can't really find anything useless to trim, as this is one of those series that usually has every little detail possessing some level of significance. Otherwise I believe I've addressed your concerns (italicized True North and tweaked the prose). Thanks, as always, for reviewing! Wow, that man certainly knows his science fiction...! Ruby 2010/2013 04:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy muff then, happy enough to pass this one. Well done! If you haven't checked him out yet, do so. GRAPPLE X 04:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]